Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 3.2 90B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 4 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 39.4 to 11.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 27.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | — |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | — |
| LMArena French | 1403 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 3.2 90B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.