Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 2-70B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 40.2 to 7.4.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 35 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1484 | 1079 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1073 |
| DTBench | — | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1091 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1039 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 26.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Llama 2-70B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1449 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1041 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1143 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 927 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1071 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1062 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1381 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 2-70B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 2-70B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 2-70B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.