Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 2-13B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 30.0.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95), Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1062 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88), Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 105.8 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105), Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121), Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89), Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 1009 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1086 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61), Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1046 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91), Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 2-13B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 2-13B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.