Model comparison

INTELLECT-1 vs Llama 3.1-8B

Llama 3.1-8B has enough public results to be ranked (#352); INTELLECT-1 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both.
  • Llama 3.1-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

INTELLECT-1 and Llama 3.1-8B specifications
INTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
ProviderHugging FaceMeta
Noometry Index—23.0
Released2024-11-292024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked743

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
SciCode—13.2%
WeirdML—1.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
LMArena Coding—1195
BigCodeBench Complete—40.5%
HumanEval+—62.8%
MBPP+—55.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—25.8%
BALROG—15.1%

Reasoning Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
Epoch Capabilities Index100.86116.57
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1175
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—5.4%
BIG-Bench Hard34.9%—
HellaSwag71.4%—
PIQA—81.2%
WinoGrande65.8%—

Math Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
GSM8K38.6%82.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.7%
Omni-MATH—13.7%
LMArena Math—1179
MATH Level 5—22.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
MMLU49.9%56.1%
GPQA Diamond—27%
MMLU-Pro—40.6%
GPQA (HELM)—24.7%
LMArena Expert—1144
ARC (AI2) Challenge54.5%—
BoolQ—82.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Non-English—1148
LMArena Chinese—1151
LMArena French—1177
LMArena German—1144
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1053
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
IFEval—74.3%
LMArena Instruction Following—1159

Long Context Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Longer Query—1182

Writing & Preference Not comparable

INTELLECT-1: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkINTELLECT-1Llama 3.1-8B
LMArena Text—1187
LMArena Creative Writing—1154
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—713
WildBench—68.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1172

Frequently asked questions

Is INTELLECT-1 better than Llama 3.1-8B?

Llama 3.1-8B has enough public results to be ranked (#352); INTELLECT-1 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do INTELLECT-1 and Llama 3.1-8B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. INTELLECT-1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-8B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper