Model comparison

Inkling vs Qwen2.5-Max

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 35.3.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Inkling and Qwen2.5-Max specifications
InklingQwen2.5-Max
ProviderThinking Machines LabAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.140.7
Released2026-07-152025-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5-Max leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Coding14641359
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
LiveBench Coding—64.4%
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Qwen2.5-Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14511360
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54132.53
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
DTBench87.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LMCA37.6%—
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Qwen2.5-Max leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Math14791369
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Expert14651337
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
Confabulations—21.8%

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English14341352
LMArena Chinese14901382
LMArena French14581396
LMArena German14461350
LMArena Japanese14291300
LMArena Korean14041304
LMArena Russian14291353
LMArena Spanish14481377

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Instruction Following14261335
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query14341358

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text14411367
LMArena Creative Writing13871339
LMArena Multi-Turn14361364
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen2.5-Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper