Model comparison

Inkling vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 19.5.

Side by side

Inkling and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
InklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderThinking Machines LabAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index44.132.7
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4116

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14641210
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14511208
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14791208
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1465—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14341160
LMArena Chinese14901192
LMArena Russian14291187
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14261186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14341194

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14411218
LMArena Creative Writing13871199
LMArena Multi-Turn14361221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
WildBench—73.4%
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (34.5 vs 35.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper