Model comparison

Inkling vs Muse Glimmer

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 38.5.

Side by side

Inkling and Muse Glimmer specifications
InklingMuse Glimmer
ProviderThinking Machines LabMeta
Noometry Index44.141.7
Released2026-07-152026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Glimmer leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev14131355
SciCode47%44.9%
LMArena Coding14641416
FrontierCode14%—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Muse Glimmer: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
CritPt5.4%2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14511396
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—

Math Muse Glimmer leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Math14791417
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert14651386
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English14341384
LMArena Chinese14901412
LMArena Russian14291390
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1446—
LMArena Japanese1429—
LMArena Korean1404—
LMArena Spanish1448—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following14261375

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query14341382

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text14411389
LMArena Creative Writing13871339
LMArena Multi-Turn14361399
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Muse Glimmer?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Muse Glimmer share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper