Noometry

Model comparison

Inkling vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Inkling and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 40.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 66K.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

InklingMiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderThinking Machines LabXiaomi
Noometry Index44.143.6
Released2026-07-152026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window66K262K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.87$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$4.68$0.28
Results tracked4118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding14641466
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts14511445
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54—

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math14791430
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert14651449
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision—1228

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English14341404
LMArena Chinese14901465
LMArena French14581447
LMArena German14461399
LMArena Japanese14291317
LMArena Korean14041355
LMArena Russian14291412
LMArena Spanish14481434

Instruction Following Too close to call

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following14261428

Long Context Too close to call

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query14341442

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

BenchmarkInklingMiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text14411423
LMArena Creative Writing13871392
LMArena Multi-Turn14361445
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

Inkling and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 43.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Inkling or MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.

Is Inkling or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper