Model comparison

Inkling vs Llama 3-8B

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 88.9% for Inkling and 1.9% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Inkling and Llama 3-8B specifications
InklingLlama 3-8B
ProviderThinking Machines LabMeta
Noometry Index44.125.5
Released2026-07-152024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling leads

Inkling: 34.5 (#234), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding14641152
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1413—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
ALE-Bench946—
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.6 (#85), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.4 (#56), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
Chess Puzzles21%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14511133
DTBench87.5%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index148.54116.45
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
LMCA37.6%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.3 (#225), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%1.9%
LMArena Math14791151
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
ProofBench0%—
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.1 (#49), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond88.3%26.1%
LMArena Expert14651113
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.0 (#52), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English14341098
LMArena Chinese14901076
LMArena French14581159
LMArena German14461104
LMArena Japanese1429967
LMArena Korean14041004
LMArena Russian14291109
LMArena Spanish14481173

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.1 (#71), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following14261127

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.8 (#86), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query14341128

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.2 (#51), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text14411166
LMArena Creative Writing13871150
LMArena Multi-Turn14361152
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Llama 3-8B?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Llama 3-8B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper