Model comparison

Inkling vs Llama 2-7B

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

28.6

Rank #315 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.5 to 28.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 21% for Inkling and 0% for Llama 2-7B.

Side by side

Inkling and Llama 2-7B specifications
InklingLlama 2-7B
ProviderThinking Machines LabMeta
Noometry Index44.128.6
Released2026-07-152023-07-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4129

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling leads

Inkling: 34.1 (#229), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Coding14631002
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1412—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.5 (#76), Llama 2-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.6 (#48), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
Chess Puzzles21%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts14521009
Epoch Capabilities Index148.698.54
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Inkling leads

Inkling: 31.2 (#198), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Math14821042
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.2 (#44), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Expert14681036
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling: —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.2 (#49), Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1434973
LMArena Chinese1495973
LMArena French1453969
LMArena German1456978
LMArena Russian1430995
LMArena Spanish14421007
LMArena Japanese1428—
LMArena Korean1401—

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Inkling: 75.3 (#65), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14271006

Long Context Inkling leads

Inkling: 43.9 (#79), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1436999

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.5 (#48), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingLlama 2-7B
LMArena Text14431053
LMArena Creative Writing13901033
LMArena Multi-Turn14361029
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Llama 2-7B?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Llama 2-7B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper