Model comparison
Inkling-Small vs Qwen1.5-110B
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 38.0.
Side by side
| Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 524K | — |
| Max output | 1.05M | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1184 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1168 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1185 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |
Multilingual Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1142 |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1158 |
Long Context Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1160 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Inkling-Small or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.