Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs phi-3-medium 14B

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #57 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.1

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.3 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 88.5% for Inkling-Small and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Inkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderThinking Machines LabMicrosoft
Noometry Index46.529.1
Released2026-07-152024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena WebDev1408—
SciCode48.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1451—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Reasoning Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index150.13121.18
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—
LMArena Math1453—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond88.5%27.6%
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
LMArena Expert1442—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1400—
LMArena Chinese1458—
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1412—
LMArena Japanese1399—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1392—
LMArena Spanish1426—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1397—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1401—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-Smallphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1413—
LMArena Creative Writing1330—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
LMArena Multi-Turn1420—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper