Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Mercury

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 17.5.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Mercury specifications
Inkling-SmallMercury
ProviderThinking Machines LabInception
Noometry Index46.537.6
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Coding14511322
LMArena WebDev1409—
SciCode48.7%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts14231285
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—

Math Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—
LMArena Math1459—

Knowledge Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Mercury: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Non-English14021260
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1436—
LMArena German1405—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1428—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Instruction Following13991239

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Longer Query14011266

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallMercury
LMArena Text14141282
LMArena Creative Writing13311191
LMArena Multi-Turn14181282
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Mercury?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Mercury better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper