Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 29.7.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Inkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderThinking Machines LabMoonshot AI
Noometry Index46.543.6
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena WebDev14091404
LMArena Coding14511484
SciCode48.7%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14231443
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math14591442
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14421440
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—

Multimodal Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision12351254

Multilingual Too close to call

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14021406
LMArena Chinese14651449
LMArena French14361403
LMArena German14051413
LMArena Korean13631378
LMArena Russian13911404
LMArena Spanish14281447
LMArena Japanese1405—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following13991430

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14011435

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text14141420
LMArena Creative Writing13311381
LMArena Multi-Turn14181427
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 42.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper