Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1247 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1244 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1250 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1221 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1240 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1210 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1243 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#213); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.