Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen1.5-110B
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 60.3.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 34.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1185 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1144 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1142 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1158 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1160 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen1.5-110B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.