Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 49.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1016 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 993 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1018 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 947 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 978 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1007 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.