Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 37.7.
- Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1361 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1345 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and o1 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.