Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

35.9

Rank #213 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.6 to 44.0.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index35.949.8
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1928

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding12471497
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12401490
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
Omni-MATH29.6%—
LMArena Math1251—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert12441485
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12161479
LMArena Chinese12501519
LMArena Russian11981494
LMArena Spanish1258—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12211466
IFEval89%—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query12401483

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12411486
LMArena Creative Writing12101444
LMArena Multi-Turn12431504
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840
WildBench73.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper