Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 32.0.
  • Granite 4.0 H Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and Muse Spark specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index36.550.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Coding12491481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts12401474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Math12471455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
Omni-MATH29.6%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Expert12511457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English12161464
LMArena Chinese12491509
LMArena Russian12011466
LMArena Spanish12581472
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following12221442
IFEval89%—

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query12421451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMuse Spark
LMArena Text12411474
LMArena Creative Writing12111459
LMArena Multi-Turn12421477
WildBench73.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Muse Spark share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper