Model comparison

Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 H Small IBM

36.5

Rank #214 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 32.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 H Small and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Granite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
ProviderIBMMiniMax
Noometry Index36.543.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding12491469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts12401447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math12471429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%
Omni-MATH29.6%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert12511461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
MMLU-Pro56.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English12161420
LMArena Chinese12491463
LMArena Russian12011428
LMArena Spanish12581432
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following12221433
IFEval89%—

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query12421445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 H SmallMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text12411433
LMArena Creative Writing12111404
LMArena Multi-Turn12421442
WildBench73.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiniMax-M3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper