Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 43.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Vectara Hallucination Rate: 5.2% for Granite 4.0 H Small and 12.9% for MiniMax-M2.7.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1444 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1441 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1405 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1412 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.