Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.7

Rank #118 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.4 to 33.5.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper at $0.25 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Hy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.641.7
Released2026-08-282026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output64K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$2
Results tracked328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena WebDev16331254
SciCode—29.3%
LMArena Coding—1410

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1400
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1404

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English—1379
LMArena Chinese—1458
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1326
LMArena Korean—1354
LMArena Russian—1377
LMArena Spanish—1390

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following—1379

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query—1390

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1347
LMArena Multi-Turn—1391

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper