Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Qwen3 32B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 39.7.
- Both cost about the same: $0.83 input and $2.50 output per million tokens.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 39.2 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 64K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.83 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1334 |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3 32B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.
Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3 32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.