Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Qwen3 235B-A22B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hy4 preview leads 31.9 to 15.7.
- Both cost about the same: $0.83 input and $2.50 output per million tokens.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 43.5 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 64K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.83 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 41% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1445 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 52.1% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -11.34 |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 1.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 31% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 69.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 11% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1433 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 9% |
| DTBench | — | 80.3% |
| LMCA | — | 29.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.85 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.7 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1432 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 68.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 8.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 80.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 84.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1463 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1481 |
| LMArena French | — | 1445 |
| LMArena German | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1430 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 83.5% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1408 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 75% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1426 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1419 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1384 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1366 |
| WildBench | — | 86.6% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1432 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.
Is Hy4 preview or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.