Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy4 preview leads 51.6 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper at $0.66 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 33K |
| Max output | 64K | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | $1 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is cheaper. It lists at $0.66 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.
Is Hy4 preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.