Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Qwen1.5-72B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 33.2.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1148 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1164 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1141 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy4 preview or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen1.5-72B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.