Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs Qwen1.5-14B
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 32.4.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 64K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
Reasoning Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy4 preview or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.