Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Mixtral 8x22B

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 22.9.
  • Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.83 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Mixtral 8x22B.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 64K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Hy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index45.327.1
Released2026-08-282024-04-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M64K
Max output64K64K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$2
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$6
Results tracked334

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
LMArena WebDev1632—
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.03
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
ProofBench75%—
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English—1128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1057
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1151

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
IFEval—72.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1147

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text—1162
LMArena Creative Writing—1141
WildBench—71.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1130

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Mixtral 8x22B?

Hy4 preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.83 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Mixtral 8x22B lists at $2 and $6.

Is Hy4 preview or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 24.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Mixtral 8x22B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper