Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs MiniMax-M2

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 37.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 68.2% for Hy4 preview and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
  • MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Hy4 previewMiniMax-M2
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index45.337.4
Released2026-08-282025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.75$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$2.25$1.20
Results tracked321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena WebDev16321297
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena Coding—1370

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%14.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1357

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1352

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English—1313
LMArena Chinese—1366
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Russian—1331
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following—1328

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query—1331

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text—1340
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
LMArena Multi-Turn—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than MiniMax-M2?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2 costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.

Is Hy4 preview or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and MiniMax-M2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper