Model comparison
Hy4 preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 31.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 75% for Hy4 preview and 63% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.75 / $2.25 for Hy4 preview.
Side by side
| Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2026-08-28 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.75 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.25 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1632 | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1504 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1482 |
Math Hy4 preview leads
Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 75% | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1501 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1463 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hy4 preview: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hy4 preview | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy4 preview better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.75 and $2.25.
Is Hy4 preview or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 51.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.