Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 50.3.
- Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 42.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3.6 27B?
Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.
Is Hy3 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.