Noometry

Model comparison

Hy3 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Hy3 and Qwen3 235B-A22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hy3 leads 26.1 to 15.7.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 235B-A22B.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Hy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.243.5
Released2026-07-062025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output128K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$2.80
Results tracked1949

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding14641445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode—42.4%
WeirdML—41%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471433
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—29.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.85
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Math14751432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
MATH Level 5—68.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert14601463
GPQA Diamond—80.1%
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English14261409
LMArena Chinese14931481
LMArena French14611445
LMArena German14391433
LMArena Japanese13921399
LMArena Korean13951391
LMArena Russian14321411
LMArena Spanish14561430

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following14261408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query14421426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

BenchmarkHy3Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text14391419
LMArena Creative Writing14021384
LMArena Multi-Turn14361432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Hy3 and Qwen3 235B-A22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.2 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

Is Hy3 or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper