Model comparison
Hy3 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.13 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.53 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1107 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1065 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1080 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1058 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.