Model comparison

Hy3 vs o3-mini

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and o3-mini in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 28.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $1.10 / $4.40 for o3-mini.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy3 and o3-mini specifications
Hy3o3-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index44.236.7
Released2026-07-062024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output128K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$1.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$4.40
Results tracked1951

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Coding14641378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14471366
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Expert14601364
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Non-English14261319
LMArena Chinese14931379
LMArena French14611334
LMArena German14391303
LMArena Japanese13921286
LMArena Korean13951314
LMArena Russian14321304
LMArena Spanish14561321

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14261337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Longer Query14421343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o3-mini
LMArena Text14391337
LMArena Creative Writing14021286
LMArena Multi-Turn14361320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than o3-mini?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or o3-mini?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; o3-mini lists at $1.10 and $4.40.

Is Hy3 or o3-mini better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and o3-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper