Model comparison

Hy3 vs o1-mini

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hy3 leads 25.0 to 8.9.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy3 and o1-mini specifications
Hy3o1-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index43.633.7
Released2026-07-062024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.13—
Output $ / M tokens$0.53—
Results tracked1739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Coding14651362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
LMArena WebDev1509—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14491333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Math14751358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Expert14611316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Non-English14271289
LMArena Chinese14961314
LMArena French14611292
LMArena Korean13901223
LMArena Russian14351283
LMArena Spanish14481302
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14251304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14431321

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3o1-mini
LMArena Text14421317
LMArena Creative Writing13991244
LMArena Multi-Turn14361314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than o1-mini?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hy3 or o1-mini better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and o1-mini share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper