Model comparison

Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 52.3.
  • Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0825 / $0.33 for Hy3.

Side by side

Hy3 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B specifications
Hy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderTencentNVIDIA
Noometry Index44.240.6
Released2026-07-062025-12-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output128K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825$0.05
Output $ / M tokens$0.33$0.20
Results tracked1918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Coding14641378
LMArena WebDev1508—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471348
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Math14751371

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Expert14601355
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.6%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Non-English14261320
LMArena Chinese14931382
LMArena French14611396
LMArena German14391348
LMArena Japanese13921268
LMArena Korean13951269
LMArena Russian14321303
LMArena Spanish14561376

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Instruction Following14261304

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Longer Query14421300

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text14391348
LMArena Creative Writing14021269
LMArena Multi-Turn14361319

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.0825 and $0.33.

Is Hy3 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper