Model comparison
Hy3 vs Mistral Small 3.2
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 45.0.
- Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0825 / $0.33 for Hy3.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | — |
Reasoning Hy3 leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1475 | — |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.0825 and $0.33.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.