Model comparison

Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 53.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 41.2% for Hy3 and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

Hy3 and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Hy3MiniMax-M2
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index44.237.4
Released2026-07-062025-10-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$1.20
Results tracked1921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena WebDev15081297
LMArena Coding14641370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%14.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14471357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Math14751352

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert14601337

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English14261313
LMArena Chinese14931366
LMArena French14611335
LMArena German14391355
LMArena Russian14321331
LMArena Spanish14561326
LMArena Japanese1392—
LMArena Korean1395—

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following14261328

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query14421331

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3MiniMax-M2
LMArena Text14391340
LMArena Creative Writing14021286
LMArena Multi-Turn14361361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than MiniMax-M2?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or MiniMax-M2?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Hy3 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and MiniMax-M2 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper