Noometry

Model comparison

Hy3 vs Llama 4 Scout

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

43.6

Rank #79 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.4

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.6 to 19.9.
  • Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.13 / $0.53 for Hy3.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Hy3Llama 4 Scout
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index43.627.4
Released2026-07-062025-04-05
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.13$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.53$0.30
Results tracked1743

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.6 (#60), Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding14651286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
LMArena WebDev1509—
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 25.0 (#134), Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts14491266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 37.4 (#98), Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Math14751286
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.2 (#108), Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert14611236
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hy3: —, Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.7 (#60), Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English14271253
LMArena Chinese14961256
LMArena French14611283
LMArena Korean13901207
LMArena Russian14351263
LMArena Spanish14481277
LMArena German—1274
LMArena Japanese—1209

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.3 (#68), Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following14251248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#70), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query14431265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.5 (#75), Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

BenchmarkHy3Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text14421279
LMArena Creative Writing13991249
LMArena Multi-Turn14361281
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Llama 4 Scout?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index. Llama 4 Scout costs 1.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy3 or Llama 4 Scout?

Llama 4 Scout is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.13 and $0.53.

Is Hy3 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.6 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Llama 4 Scout share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper