Model comparison

Hy3 vs Llama 3.1-405B

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-405B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hy3 leads 62.2 to 38.9.

Side by side

Hy3 and Llama 3.1-405B specifications
Hy3Llama 3.1-405B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index44.230.7
Released2026-07-062024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0825—
Output $ / M tokens$0.33—
Results tracked1942

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Coding14641291
LMArena WebDev1508—
WeirdML—21.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hy3: —, Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
TheAgentCompany—7.4%
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Hard Prompts14471269
SimpleBench—23%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—45%
NYT Connections (extended)41.2%—
DTBench—61.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—82.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.75
ForecastBench—59.9
HellaSwag—89.2%
PIQA—85.9%
WinoGrande—89.2%

Math Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Math14751281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—9.7%
Omni-MATH—24.9%
MATH Level 5—49.8%

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Expert14601243
GPQA Diamond—50.9%
MMLU-Pro—72.3%
Confabulations—17.6%
GPQA (HELM)—52.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—95.3%
MMLU—84.5%
TriviaQA—82.7%

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Non-English14261248
LMArena Chinese14931242
LMArena French14611279
LMArena German14391252
LMArena Japanese13921208
LMArena Korean13951184
LMArena Russian14321265
LMArena Spanish14561260

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Instruction Following14261259
IFEval—81.1%

Long Context Hy3 leads

Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Longer Query14421266

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy3Llama 3.1-405B
LMArena Text14391284
LMArena Creative Writing14021262
LMArena Multi-Turn14361297
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—870
WildBench—78.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy3 better than Llama 3.1-405B?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hy3 or Llama 3.1-405B better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Llama 3.1-405B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-405B has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper