Model comparison
Hy3 vs Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Hy3 scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 50.9 to 40.8.
Side by side
| Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 44.2 | 45.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-06 | 2025-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0825 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.33 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hy3: 46.8 (#63), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1508 | 1322 |
| LMArena Coding | 1464 | 1454 |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hy3: 26.1 (#136), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1428 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 41.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hy3: 40.1 (#93), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1475 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 83.1% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Hy3: 40.8 (#114), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1439 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.2% |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hy3: 53.5 (#65), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1398 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1493 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1461 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1439 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1392 | 1357 |
| LMArena Korean | 1395 | 1330 |
| LMArena Russian | 1432 | 1391 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hy3: 75.1 (#70), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | 1403 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hy3: 44.1 (#75), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1415 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hy3: 62.2 (#81), Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hy3 | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1439 | 1415 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1436 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hy3 better than Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.8 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hy3 or Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hy3 and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hy3 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21.