Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

42.6

Rank #95 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

41.7

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 27.8 to 21.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderTencentStepFun
Noometry Index42.641.7
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14191436

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14171411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
LMArena Math—1408

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert—1422

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13831386
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1353
LMArena Korean—1350
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13981385

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14051402

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14071403
LMArena Creative Writing13891357
LMArena Multi-Turn14231405

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.2 vs 41.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper