Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Solar Pro4
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 56.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1377 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Solar Pro4?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Solar Pro4 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.