Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs o3-pro
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 42.9.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 42.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.43 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than o3-pro?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.6 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.