Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs o1
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and o1 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 42.9.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 40.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1394 |
| LMArena French | — | 1343 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than o1?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 41.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o1 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.