Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Mixtral 8x7B
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 34.2.
- Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 32K |
| Max output | — | 32K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1126 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 39.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 49.7% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1115 |
| DTBench | — | 49.6% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.47 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |
| HellaSwag | — | 86.7% |
| PIQA | — | 83.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 77.2% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 10.5% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1147 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10% |
| GSM8K | — | 74.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 33.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1088 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 87.3% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 85.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 82.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Mixtral 8x7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1077 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1166 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 931 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 968 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1111 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1109 |
| IFEval | — | 57.5% |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1103 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Mixtral 8x7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1132 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1109 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1115 |
| WildBench | — | 67.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Mixtral 8x7B?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Mixtral 8x7B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.