Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Mistral Medium

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

42.6

Rank #95 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.2 to 33.8.
  • Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Mistral Medium specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index42.636.0
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Mistral Medium: 33.8 (#241)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Coding14191434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Mistral Medium: 23.3 (#165)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts14171426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Medium: 27.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—32.2%
ProofBench—9%
LMArena Math—1409
MATH Level 5—81.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Mistral Medium: 24.9 (#260)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
GPQA Diamond—59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multimodal Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Mistral Medium: 34.6 (#82)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Vision11801172

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Mistral Medium: 52.3 (#86)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13831408
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1433
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1411
LMArena Spanish—1433

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Mistral Medium: 73.9 (#111)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following13981398

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#108)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query14051406

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Mistral Medium: 60.2 (#97)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Mistral Medium
LMArena Text14071424
LMArena Creative Writing13891391
LMArena Multi-Turn14231418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Mistral Medium?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Mistral Medium share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper