Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
NVIDIASummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 43.4.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 35.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1223 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1203 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1201 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.