Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Llama 13b
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 683 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 819 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Llama 13b?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Llama 13b share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.